Here is the legislation revenge passive-aggressive dining David Vitter for his prostitution scandal

WASHINGTON - Sen. David Vitter might have a hard vote forward. The Republican from Louisiana, who endured a prostitution scandal in 2007, is the goal of a new Bill preventing him and other senators who had been subjected to a review of ethics to apply for prostitutes, that subsidies of insurance pursuant to your use of the Senate.

A democratic Adviser passed over the law, which includes pasivo-agresivo-- aggressive or aggressive? -legislative language:

(iv) limitations. -No employee contribution payable according to section 8906 of title 5, code of the United States, with respect to the coverage of medical insurance in this paragraph, can be always on behalf of a person who has the Congressional Ethics panel relevant to determine a probable cause has been involved in the request for prostitution.

The language does not apply to any other Senator, as did not come none of the other low official canvass to participate in this type of behavior. Senator Bob Menendez (DN.J.) has been accused by conservative newspapers ask for prostitutes, but it was not weighed on the Ethics Committee.

Vitter apologized for committing "a grave sin" after the revelation.

Leading Senate majority "Harry Reid is acting like an old Vegas mafia and a desperate bully", Vitter said in a statement to politician. "This only shows how far it will go to protect their special exemption from Obamacare Washington-savvy."

In a sample of staff has become the race, the Democrats have done the calculations to find out how much the Government has contributed Vitter family health insurance since 1999, based its estimate on 75 per cent of the standard monthly premium, which is the limit of the Hill. Total, HuffPost provided: $112,624.88.

Vitter spokesman was not immediately available to respond.

If the grant is considered compensation, changing it to half session it would be unconstitutional; You may also consider a bill of attainder, which is forbidden by the Constitution.

But the Democrats do not appear to be trying to pass laws in this case, as well as trying to punish Vitter for his continuous agitation against Obamacare, particularly the provisions relating to Hill staff subsidies.

Also in HuffPost:

Subscribe to window._taboola = window._taboola | []; _taboola.push ({mode: 'autosized-1r-organic', container:'taboola-autosized-1r-organic '}); _taboola.push ({mode: 'autosized-1r-sc', container: 'taboola-autosized-1r-sc'}); window._taboola = window._taboola | []; _taboola.push({flush:true});