Affichage des articles dont le libellé est Decision. Afficher tous les articles
Affichage des articles dont le libellé est Decision. Afficher tous les articles

dimanche 13 octobre 2013

'One Decision' PSA Is Devastating Reenactment Of What Could Happen If A Child Is Left In A Car (VIDEO)

AppId is over the quota
AppId is over the quota

So far, 15 children have died of heatstroke after being left alone in cars, this summer. More than 500 have died since 1998, and 73 percent of those cases were babies under the age of 2.

Red Castle Productions has created a PSA to prevent more tragedies. In the powerful video above, actors reenact what could happen if a child is left in a car for a short time -- it can take as little as 15 minutes to suffer life-threatening injuries. The video also shows what to do if you ever notice a child alone in a car.

It's worth noting that the numbers above include kids who were left in cars by accident, and as Lisa Belkin recently reminded readers: "The parents who accidentally leave their children to die could be any of us." That's why Kids and Cars, an organization which aims to educate parents on the topic offers this acronym:

Back seat: Put something in the back seat whenever you strap a child in, so you have to open the back door, or at least turn around to find that item, when you get out of the car. Your handbag or briefcase, cellphone or employee badge.

Every child should be correctly restrained in the back seat.

Stuffed animal: Keep a brightly colored one in the car seat when your child isn’t there. Then move it from the car seat to the front seat after you strap your child in, to remind you when your baby is in the back seat.

Ask your baby sitter or child-care provider to call you within 10 minutes if your child hasn't arrived on time.

Focus on driving: Avoid cellphone calls and text-messaging while driving.

Every time you park your vehicle -- every single time -- open the back door to make sure no one has been left behind.

(hat tip Viral Viral Video)

lundi 23 septembre 2013

Gene Marks: Alec Baldwin And 28,443,043 Others Who Will Benefit By The President's Decision To Delay The Employer Mandate One Year

AppId is over the quota
AppId is over the quota
Get Small Business Newsletters: Subscribe

On January 1, 2014 all employers with more than fifty full time (equivalent) employees must provide health insurance for their full time employees or face fines up to $3,000 per employee. It's called the "employer mandate" and it's a requirement from the 2010 Affordable Care Act, or Healthcare Reform or Obamacare. Got all that? Yeah, I didn't think so. Most of the business owners I know (clients and those I speak to around the country) aren't getting it, or agreeing with it. One recent survey found that "more than 40 percent of small-business owners say that Obamacare has caused them to freeze hiring, while nearly a fifth say that it has caused them to cut existing workers" and a Gallup poll revealed that "half of U.S. small businesses think the health law is bad for them."

So this week the President responded. He postponed the employer mandate for a year. And now here comes the debate. Was that a good idea? A bad idea? Expensive? Does it prove that Obamacare is a "train wreck" as Rep. Boehner called it? Or is it just a political move. It's all of that. It's none of that. It's a brilliant decision! Because it benefits so many people, businesses and organizations. Like who?

Let's start with: The President. Hey, he's responding to all those folks out there. He's listening to the business community. He's all about the common folks! He wants a smart government. He's talking common sense. And oh, just by coincidence he's trying to win a majority in Congress and what idiot originally came up with the timing of this employer mandate thing anyway? (Pelosi? Curses!) So let's be smart and really show some common sense...and push this monster to after the election. Brilliant!

468 Republicans. There are 33 Republicans who will be fighting for Senate seats in 2014 and another 435 who will be contesting for spots in the House of Representatives. They are thrilled with the President's decision. They can tell their constituents that he is weak, indecisive and a terrible three-point shooter. They can now claim that this decision is clear proof that the Obamacare is a terrible, expensive and not fully-thought-out idea. And then make promises to fund sheep institutes and obsolete aircraft equipment.

468 Democrats. The 468 Republicans will be facing an equal number of Democrats opposing them and they're loving that the President has postponed the employer mandate decision. This way they can avoid abuse from their business voters who will likely be screaming at them eleven months after the mandate was originally supposed to take affect. Will they be able to handle the abuse from Barbara Streisand, Bette Midler and Whoopi Goldberg? Only time will tell.

1.4 million part-time workers. To avoid the employer mandate, many large companies were limiting workers to less than 30 hours per week so that they were not required to provide health insurance coverage. Great for the companies. But not so good for the workers, where many would likely have to take two part time jobs to make ends meet, yet still not get health coverage. The delay gives these part timers a little breathing room, and a little more time to work more hours so this reduces the chance that we will be eating someone's else's booger the next time we have a Big Mac.

42,000 employers not providing insurance. According to the Census Bureau there are more than 600,000 firms employing more than 50 employees and according to the Kaiser Foundation approximately 7% of them don't provide health insurance. Which means that these 42,000 business owners can not only avoid providing benefits to their people but they also get an extra year to beat their spouses, kick a few puppies and pollute the environment too.

100 insurance companies. One of the reasons why the mandate was delayed was to give the government more time to "negotiate" with insurance companies so that they can be part of the state healthcare exchanges, where we will buying our insurance. Translation: more time for the insurance companies to figure out some way to make this more affordable (psst....less benefits?) and more time for the government to cut special deals with them so the whole thing doesn't fall apart.

Alec Baldwin. Kind of takes the attention away from that silly 'ol homophobic tweet can I get a thank-you Liz Lemon please?

27 million employers in general. Even if you're a small business (less than 50 people) you'd still be subject to significant new reporting requirements being planned by the IRS and Department of Health and Human Services. And that's great news because we're always looking for more paperwork to do. Part of this delay is due to the government's effort to make their reporting requirement less complex. We'll thankfully welcome the year off from this fun. But we're not holding our breath.

Vladimir Putin. So where is that Super Bowl ring anyway Mr. Dictator? Don't think we'll let this healthcare thing take our eye off the ball for one doggone minute buster.

U.S. Chamber of Commerce. They, along with many other business groups have been against the whole healthcare thing since 2010. No matter that businesses with less than 50 people are completely exempt. They're more concerned with the long term budgetary affects on our nation's deficits which could ultimately raise our taxes. The delay for them is a win in a political environment where wins for business groups have been about as rare as wins for the Phillies.

Johnny Depp. Hopefully this healthcare disaster will overshadow his Lone Ranger disaster so he can quietly go back to making those disastrous Pirates of the Caribbean movies.

The IRS. Phew, can you hear that collective sigh? After all the pounding they've been taking about targeting political groups of late you think they really want to jump into auditing employers because they're not complying with the Affordable Care Act? And aren't they already going to have their hands full auditing the 34 million people who currently don't have health insurance but will be still be required to get it by January 1st or face penalties? Wait, am I feeling sympathy for the IRS? Next think you'll know I'll be donating to charities. Darn these rising estrogen levels!

The Media. Lots of controversy. Lots of debate. Lots of arguments. That means lots of page views and lots of angry people lining up to fill the advertising coffers of Rush and Hannity. Kaching!

Me! I write and speak about healthcare reform and its impact on business groups. And I've just been given another year of business. Ka-ching! Ka-ching!

A version of this blog previously appeared in the Philly Post.

Follow Gene Marks on Twitter: www.twitter.com/genemarks

Get Alerts

jeudi 30 mai 2013

Eric Holder Signed Off On Decision To Subpoena Fox News Telephone Records


* Fox News phone records sought in North Korea leak probe

* Holder's approval of phone subpoena not disclosed earlier (Adds Justice Department confirmation, quote)

By Mark Hosenball

WASHINGTON, May 28 (Reuters) - U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder personally approved a decision to subpoena Fox News telephone records as the Justice Department investigated an unauthorized leak regarding North Korea, officials said on Tuesday.

The Justice Department did not mention the subpoena when it issued a statement on Friday describing how Holder had vetted a decision to seek a search warrant for the contents of an email account used by Fox News reporter James Rosen.

The revelation that Holder approved subpoenas that sought Fox News phone records shows that his involvement was broader than the Justice Department had earlier acknowledged publicly, as details continue to emerge in the controversy.

Rosen reported in June 2009 that U.S. intelligence officials believed North Korea would conduct more nuclear tests in response to U.N. sanctions.

Stephen Kim, a former State Department analyst who was Rosen's alleged source, is scheduled to go on trial as soon as next year on charges that he violated an anti-espionage law. Rosen has not been charged.

"In the investigation that led to the indictment of Stephen Kim, the government issued subpoenas, with approval from the attorney general as required by Justice Department guidelines, for toll records for five phone numbers associated with the media over a two-day period," a Justice Department official said.

The Obama administration has also been under fire for a separate subpoena of Associated Press phone records as part of a different investigation of an alleged unauthorized leak.

Both incidents have sparked an outcry from journalists, but the Fox News case has proved more concerning to some because investigators described Rosen as a suspected "co-conspirator" in the leak of secret government information.

ACCUSED OF INTIMIDATION

Fox News Chairman Roger Ailes said in a statement on Thursday that the Obama administration was attempting to intimidate Fox News and its employees.

A law enforcement official said that subpoenas issued for Fox News covered telephone records for two days during 2009. The official said that a certified letter and fax notifying the general counsel of News Corp, parent of Fox News, about the subpoenas was sent on Aug. 27, 2010, the day Kim was indicted.

Authorities emailed Rosen at his work address with a similar notification, the official said. News Corp has said that it has found no record of such notifications, though it is not disputing government officials' accounts.

Mark Corallo, a Justice Department spokesman between 2002 and 2005, said that during his tenure, any request from any part of the Justice Department for the issuing of subpoenas against a news organization had to be submitted to his office for approval.

Corallo said that of "dozens" of requests from prosecutors for subpoenas directed against news organizations, he approved only one during his tenure.

President Barack Obama said last week that Holder would begin a review of Justice Department procedures related to media records. Holder, speaking to reporters on Tuesday, said he hopes to meet this week with media organizations about the review.

"We're going to have a real frank, good conversation about this," Holder said. "And I think we're going to make some changes. I'm not satisfied with where we are." (Reporting By Mark Hosenball; Additional reporting by David Ingram; Editing by Karey Van Hall and Eric Beech)

Also on HuffPost:

Get Alerts